When Edward Snowden came out as the NSA whistleblower, he received much predictable backlash from government officials, pundits and commentators, across party lines, no less.
One of the biggest criticisms of Snowden was that he should have done it the “legal way.” Even President Obama said similarly, saying Snowden should have gone through the proper channels.
According to a Washington Post article, he did. 10 times. That’s the number ten. Ten times.
When asked by European Parliament, if he felt he had exhausted all legal remedies before leaking the NSA information, Snowden replied thus:
Yes. I had reported these clearly problematic programs to more than ten distinct officials, none of whom took any action to address them. As an employee of a private company rather than a direct employee of the US government, I was not protected by US whistleblower laws, and I would not have been protected from retaliation and legal sanction for revealing classified information about lawbreaking in accordance with the recommended process.
Plus, as he mentions, he was a contractor for the United States government, not an employee. Therefore, whatever legal avenues there were or apparatuses to protect a whistleblower, would not have been applicable to him.
And even those that did go through the proper channels that were available to them were ostracized and threatened with criminal prosecution.
So, Obama, the pundits, the commentators, his detractors and so on and so forth are wrong.